The Jackson School of Global Affairs Colloquium in International Security Studies presents
Aden Knaap, Henry Chauncey ‘57 Postdoctoral Fellow in the Brady-Johnson Program in Grand Strategy
“The Rose Mary Doctrine: Hot Commodities, Cold Nationalizations, and the Legal End of Empire, 1951-1972.”
Aden is a historian currently writing a history of international courts, under contract with Princeton University Press.
A secret meeting of some of the world’s largest companies at a pub near Heathrow Airport. A chase scene in which a plane pursues an oil tanker in the Persian Gulf. Trips to glamorous destinations like Rio de Janeiro and Venice and Tokyo. This isn’t the plot of the latest James Bond film but rather episodes from an academic article, “The Rose Mary Doctrine.” It is about how Western corporations sought to stop Third World countries from nationalizing their resources by suing them in various courts, from the 1950s to the 1970s. They named this strategy the Rose Mary Doctrine, after the first shipment of expropriated property that it was successfully deployed against. In this article, I use the Doctrine to tease out the historiographical significance of three things: of law and not just violence in the history of decolonization; of various commodities and not just oil in the history of development; and of litigation and not just arbitration in the history of disputes over foreign investment. This article centers on the corporate lawyers that carried out the Doctrine, who were a lot like 007. But instead of a license to kill, they had a license to sue.